Charge Slip Generator

Client

FedEx / Parcel Management

Job TItle

Principal UX Design Lead

Services provided

Strategy, Product Design, UX, UI

Agency

Amodcs Studio

Tileline

18 months

Start Date

May 2024

My role

I led the end-to-end development of a custom "Charge Slip" system. By replacing manual processes with an automated enterprise workflow, I restored operational confidence and secured the company’s revenue tracking.

The Challenge

A high-volume parcel operation relied on a fragmented, semi-manual charge slip process to calculate handling and storage fees.As volume scaled across 100+ locations, the system failed to keep pace — leading to inconsistent fee application, operational friction, and an estimated $5M+ in annual revenue leakage.

The core issue wasn’t just interface — it was structural. Every item required an assigned handling type before accurate fees could be calculated, yet the workflow lacked safeguards to enforce completion.

The Solution

Creating AI experiences that are intuitive, reliable, and genuinely useful for people guides my work.

  • Digitized fee assignment and validation
  • Required handling type completion before finalization
  • Enabled individual, batch, or bulk assignment
  • Dynamically generated real-time fee summaries
  • Prevented slip finalization until all revenue-impacting variables were resolved

My Core Contributions

System Architecture

Defined structural rules ensuring every item carried a validated handling type before fee calculation.

Workflow Engineering

Designed flexible assignment methods (individual, small batch, bulk) to support real-world floor operations.

Revenue Safeguards

Implemented conditional UI states that blocked finalization when items were incomplete.

Cross-Functional Leadership

Partnered with product, engineering, and operations to align business logic with usable interaction design.

The Charge Slip Overview

Revenue Risk to Recovery

The manual Charge Slip process was creating operational friction and $5M+ in annual revenue leakage.I re-architected it into a scalable, automated system that restored accuracy and improved fee transparency.

There was Revenue at Risk

  • The team used manual charge slips and calculator-based fee tracking
  • There was no real-time summaries or storage fee visibility
  • Found disconnected workflows causing ~$5M+ annual leakage

A manual billing workflow was creating negative friction and measurable revenue loss across a $32M operation.

Created Modular Solutions

  • I replaced the paper slips with a digital, multi-stage workflow (build → assign → finalize → print)
  • I created a flexible system to add multple item and fee assignment, either singual or in bulk
  • Added automated fee summaries and surfaced hidden storage fee alerts

Delivered a fully modular, automated system from the ground up that was designed for accuracy, scalability, and high-volume operations.

The Approach & Strategy

  • Built a modular, scalable workflow with iterative real-world releases
  • Designed dynamic interactions to ensure accuracy and fee transparency
  • Collaborated cross-functionally to align on systemic, revenue-focused solutions

Applied system-level thinking to create a workflow that reduced errors, improved team alignment, and enabled strategic decision-making.

The Business Effect

  • Eliminated manual fee tallying and reduced errors
  • Increased fee transparency and surfaced hidden revenue
  • Supported thousands of line items per transaction

Result: Improved operational confidence and strengthened revenue protection at enterprise scale.

Scaling Beyond the System

  • 100+ hotel / convention loactions
  • 2M+ packages annually
  • $32M in parcel revenue
  • Achieved 9% year-over-year growth

System Modernization Required

  • Replace paper slips with a digital workflow
  • Automate fee calculations and alerts
  • Enable fast item assignment for bulk and high-volume scenarios
  • Improve communication across operational teams

Manual Billing Infrastructure

  • Paper-based 3-part charge slips with handwritten adjustments
  • Manual calculations with no real-time fee or storage visibility
  • Fragmented team communication and error-prone workflows pickup and delivery calculations

Discovery

Research

To ensure the Charge Slip system addressed both operational and business needs, I conducted structured stakeholder interviews across multiple locations. This phase clarified constraints, priorities, and areas of high operational risk.

Stakeholder Interview

  • Clarified scope, objectives, and operational constraints
  • Identified bottlenecks, revenue risks, and error-prone workflows
  • Captured staff insights, pain points, and communication gaps

Onsite observations uncovered critical workflow patterns and pain points, directly shaping design decisions and prioritizing improvements for both accuracy and operational scalability.

Gayloard Texan Resort & Convention

1.3 million Sq. Ft of Resort Space
500K SQ. FT of convention Space
87 Meeting rooms
1814 guest rooms

Gayloard Convention Center Tour

  • Observed end-to-end workflows and identified bottlenecks
  • Mapped handoffs and tracked operational gaps
  • Collected staff feedback, improvement ideas, and workarounds

Onsite observations uncovered critical workflow patterns and pain points, directly shaping design decisions and prioritizing improvements for both accuracy and operational scalability.

Key research Insights / Takeaways

Storage

Organizes slips by type—blank, open, or complicated—keeping records structured and accessible.

Opportunity: Enable quick digital categorization and retrieval of charge slips.

Notes

Team members used sticky notes to track customer questions manually.

Opportunity: Track customer questions in real time without manual workarounds.

REcord Retention

Physical charge slips are separated into three-part forms for filing and audit compliance.

Opportunity: Maintain a digital audit trail while meeting compliance requirements

Journey Mapping

  • Mapped end-to-end operational workflows across store and warehouse environments
  • Identified happy paths and critical pain point
  • Highlighted where errors or bottlenecks typically arise
  • Provided stakeholders a holistic view of the entire process

Journey mapping revealed key gaps and inconsistencies in the current workflow, giving both the team and stakeholders a shared understanding of where the system needed improvement.

User Flows / Mapping

  • Validated the 4-step Charge Slip process with stakeholders
  • Mapped multiple entry and exit points across system states
  • Considered cross-device workflows for simultaneous operations
  • Built consensus on workflow priorities and constraints

User flows clarified complex multi-step processes, enabling us to design a system that supports both high-volume and small-scale operations.

Wires and Prototyping

  • Created early screens to gather stakeholder and engineering feedback
  • Worked within the FedEx FUSE design system while exploring new material
  • Iterated collaboratively to test usability and interface approaches
  • Evaluated performance across devices and simultaneous use cases

Wireframes provided a concrete foundation for discussion, helping secure buy-in and inform progressive design decisions while respecting system constraints.. Interactive prototypes confirmed design decisions, validated workflows, and highlighted areas for refinement—ensuring the system was robust, usable, and scalable.

Feature Highlights

The Key Takeaways

The charge slip system required a structured approach: every item needed a defined handling type before fees could be calculated and summarized accurately.

The experience had to balance flexibility in assignment with strict operational safeguards to prevent revenue gaps.

Feature Requirements

  • Require handling type for every item before proceeding
  • Support individual, batch, or bulk item assignment
  • Captured staff insights, pain points, and communication gaps

Designing multiple assignment methods required reducing noise while keeping the most critical information

Unassigned Items

  • Start with items unassigned in the charge slip
  • Disable fee summary until all items have a handling type
  • Allow users to assign items individually or in bulk

The system intentionally blocks finalization to ensure every fee is calculated and accounted for.

Fee SUmmary

  • Activate fee summary once all items are assigned
  • Handling and storage fees are calculated dynamically
  • Enable finalization controls after validation while keeping assignment flexible

The summary acts as both confirmation and safeguard

Featured projects

No items found.
See live